Skip to content
  • Solar Media
    • Solar Power Portal
    • Energy Storage News
    • Current
    • Events
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • Solar Media
    • Solar Power Portal
    • Energy Storage News
    • Current
    • Events
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
Subscribe To Premium
Premium Subscription
Sign In
My Account
News
Industry Updates
Premium
Photovoltaics International
PV Tech Power
Technical Papers
Market Watch
Cell Processing
PV Modules
Fab & Facilities
Materials
Thin Film
Plant Performance
Financial, Legal, Professional
Manufacturing
Markets & Finance
Power Plants
Features
Editors’ Blog
Guest Blog
Product Reviews
Interviews
Featured Articles
Long Reads
Special Reports
Sponsored Papers
Market Research
Events & Webinars
Solar Media Events
Upcoming Webinars
On-Demand Webinars
SNEC 2021 Video Library
Sponsored Papers

Potential induced degradation (PID): a test campaign at module level

April 8, 2017
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email

By J. Carolus, M. Daenen, Hasselt University and IMEC VZW

Potential induced degradation (PID) of photovoltaic (PV) modules gets a lot of attention since 2010 when Solon published their findings about a degradation mechanism in their PV modules caused by high potential differences. When multiple PV modules are connected in series, a potential difference up to 1000 V or at some places even 1500 V is created between the cell and the grounded frame. This electrical field causes a leakage current and ion diffusion. PID is a multi-level degradation with causes and solutions at cell, module and system level.

A test campaign was conducted within the frame of a feasibility study for pidbull, a curing technology for PID developed by pidbull nv. 80 PV modules were characterized whereof 49 PV modules were stressed and cured for PID. The selected set of PV modules was composed of 49 different module types of 33 brands. The test was done according to the foil-method, as described by the standard in progress IEC 62804. However, to apply higher stressing and curing rates, the modules were tested with an aluminium foil inside a climate chamber for 96 hours. After the stress test, only 22% of the tested modules passed the 5% loss criteria as described by IEC 62804. In other words, 78% out of a set of today’s most installed PV modules in Flanders are PID sensitive. Remarkable is that only 16 out of the 49 PV modules have less than 20% PID after the stress test. Additionally, a linear trend for PID reversibility was shown for modules with a stress level of less than 85%. The modules which lost more than 85% due to PID showed a lower recovery rate or in worst case didn’t recover at all.

Material Download

  • About
  • Meet the Team
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • About
  • Meet the Team
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
© Solar Media Limited 2024